I agree with this conclusion but probably for different reasons. I'm guessing the last shot was taken with a macro lens by the characteristics of the image -- being a closeup and all. The first two are general scenes which are more likely to be taken with a basic point and shoot digital camera. As far as the shots go and distinguising which ones were taken by a digital camera and which one is from traditional print or slide film I think it's almost impossible to tell. Really, all of them are simply digital images whether they are taken originally on a digital camera or scanned in later. At this poor quality, I don't think it matters. Give me a 25 meg file and I may be able to pick out the diffences between a scanned image and an image taken with a point and shoot. I'm not sure it would be easy however, distinguishing the difference if a high-end digital camera and good lens was used.
In a message dated 4/26/02 11:40:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: <<It's more difficult to tell on the net instead of having prints in hand, but I would guess that the first 2 are digital and the third is film. DG>> - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
