In answer to Mt. RUshmore?
Ithink they areboth desecrating nature , but asa reply to Rushmore
bothers me less -
Nice shots, Don -
On 10/24/2015 2:25 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
I imagine the thought of just tweeting
the viewing area and being done with it is prevalent in the teams quiet
mutterings.
J
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24, 2015, at 10:28 AM, knarf <[email protected]> wrote:
I wouldn't say it's hideous artwork but it's certainly a desecration of a
beautiful natural formation.
If they stopped now I'd be pretty pleased.
Cheers,
frank
On October 24, 2015 12:03:12 PM EDT, Donald Guthrie <[email protected]>
wrote:
On the subject of statues carved out of the hillside this one is among
the controversial set. Is it the hopeless dream that will be never
completed, another hideous artwork, or a great tribute to Native
Americans who have blessed the project. It is being done entirely with
private funding & contributions. But many complain that more money has
been spent on the observation point than on the carving.
These photos were all taken in September 2015 from the observation
building which is a mile from the statue.
https://www.flickr.com/gp/valdon/340104
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
