Much of that was achieved in post. But Portra 400 has good latitude, and I usually rated it at ISO 320, which seemed to make it even better.
Paul via phone > On Nov 7, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Bulent Celasun <[email protected]> wrote: > > No blown highlights on the hat... > Her face in the shadow is seen nicely. > > I wonder how much of this was due the latitude of the film and > how much to the experience of the photographer. > > Bulent > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > http://patoloji.gen.tr > http://celasun.wordpress.com/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/ > http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822 > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bulentcelasun > > > 2015-11-06 0:22 GMT+03:00 Paul Stenquist <[email protected]>: >> Santa Monica, California, 2002, Pentax 6x7, probably the 300/4, but could >> have been the 165/4 LS. Portra 400VC rated at ISO 320, according to my scant >> notes. >> >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18122572&size=lg >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
