K lenses are generally less common than M and A series lenses.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 3:04 PM Subject: Re: K, A, M macro lenses... > K and M has a *lot* better build in my view. A has better coating. > If the design is the same (check the Boz's site -- I think they are), > I can't see why K should be more expensive. > > > well ok, lets say there are 3 100/4 lenses. One k, a, m each. I can > > understand A being priced at more because of the A feature. But is there > > a optical quality reason to price the K more than the M ? I can > > understand rarity factor but that plays only for collectors... > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
