Personally, I've never really seen the point to providing "full size, high rez images … for examination" unless I was discussing a particular point of interest and needed to illustrate it with a full resolution photo, and then it's usually only a 1:1 pixel resolution clip that's needed. But, to satisfy your curiosity, here are three of the gallery photos as original size, 6000x4000 pixel JPEGs, rendered from the TIFF originals and compressed at the LR6.3 70% quality level to save a little upload/download time and space. They're about 6 to 7 Megabytes in size, each.
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/585/22702197767_161675395e_o.jpg https://farm1.staticflickr.com/649/23132198071_49654f5b17_o.jpg https://farm1.staticflickr.com/607/23120759675_f581bc0c6c_o.jpg Viewed @ 1:1 on my Apple Thunderbolt Display 27" at its maximum resolution, they're about 4x the size of the available screen area. Hmm, I wonder how they would look on an iMac with 5K display? Well, I have an errand to run over near the local Apple Store … :-) G > On Nov 18, 2015, at 8:26 AM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why no full size, high res images available for examination? A million > cameras can produce a good 1300x867 jpeg. This seems odd to me. > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi > <godfreydigio...@me.com> wrote: > >> This is a link to an album where I'll be posting photos with the camera >> while I learn how to operate it. An initial set of eight photos are there >> now: >> >> https://flic.kr/s/aHskpybYoz -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
