----- Original Message ----- From: Rob Studdert Subject: Re: The old digital/film debate
> On 28 Apr 2002 at 17:20, William Robb wrote: > > > One issue that comes to mind for me is copyright. If the > > photographer cannot produce an original negative to prove > > ownership, can he enforce copyright on the image? > > Hi Bill, > > Interesting question. I figure that firstly information including the time and > date that the shot was taken is embedded in the digital file. It can be edited > with some share ware tools however there are plenty of ways that you can be > dishonest with film too. I suppose that if you provided a set of sequential > thumb-nail images from the remainder of the shoot that would clinch it in a > legal battle? Hmm, Is time and date enough? Do any of them imbed something like the cameras's serial number, or some other identifier that is unique to the camera? This could make for an interesting legal debate. Fortunately, I am not a lawyer. William Robb > > One interesting exclusion in the current crop of digital cameras is that even > though they write all manner of information into the file at the time of > capture none provide an option for the camera owner/authors name to be embedded > in the file. I wonder when this will become an option? > > Cheers, > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
