I'm pretty sure the display you see on the back of the camera is produced from the (low-quality) JPEG included in every image file.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 07:39:49PM -0600, Darren Addy wrote: > Well I have assumed my RAW files were OK, but I haven't checked yet. > Now I'm wondering. Will have to check when I get home later this > weekend. I have no explanation for how a RAW file would show > processing like that. I thought a RAW file was a RAW file. > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Steve Sharpe <[email protected]> wrote: > > The same thing happened to me this past summer with my K-3, and I shoot > > exclusively RAW, no JPEGs. But every image was coming out in all these > > otherworldly colours...which Aperture automatically fixed so I didn't > > pay much attention. Then I made some astrophotos and noticed that the > > sky was pink in one exposure, magenta in the next...etc. etc. To get it > > back to reality and I had to reset the camera to the factory defaults > > and then reprogramme it to my preferences. > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:49:53 +1100, Rob Studdert wrote: > >> I got caught mid event by the "Cross-Processing" demon too using my > >> K3, had me baffled, must have bumped the buttons. I didn't have time > >> to screw about so I reverted to single body shooting and it was a long > >> event, I must have changed lenses 100 times :( > >> > >> On 25 November 2015 at 06:03, John <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Ok, so SWAG - it's bracketing white balance. > >>> > >>> On 11/23/2015 2:26 PM, Darren Addy wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you > >>>> an > >>>> idea: > >>>> > >>>> http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a > >>>>>> group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I > >>>>>> raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not > >>>>>> through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked > >>>>>> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme > >>>>>> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all > >>>>>> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each > >>>>>> different. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE > >>>>>> anything because of the error, but still annoying). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas? > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG. > > > > --- > > > > Steven Sharpe - The Office Gallery > > > > [email protected] > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > > follow the directions. > > > > -- > Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
