Flaunting tauntingly? Good.

Paul via phone

> On Dec 15, 2015, at 6:13 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Well, it would be appreciated, but 
> I expect others will soon be happily
> flaunting this lens tauntingly.
> 
> J
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Well, when I can shoot some pics I will post them. Still socked in with gray 
>> skies and lots of work.
>> 
>> Paul via phone
>> 
>>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:52 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK, but in this this case, 
>>> listers will
>>> be hoping to make a realistic judgment of the lens' practical performance.
>>> 
>>> J
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I’ve found that K3 images in general require very little sharpening, 
>>>> depending on the lens of course. This seemed particularly true in 
>>>> comparison to K5 images. However, I always do some sharpening when working 
>>>> on a photo for presentation. I work for a best subjective look, but do it 
>>>> at 100% on my 2560 x 1440 monitor. But for testing purposes, I don’t 
>>>> sharpen. That’s particularly important when shooting for fine focus 
>>>> adjustment. Being able to clearly differentiate the difference in 
>>>> sharpness is helpful. Here, I wanted to see exactly what the lens and 
>>>> sensor could accomplish on their own. That being said there’s some default 
>>>> sharpening in a photoshop RAW conversion. Mine is set at Adobe’s default 
>>>> value, whatever that may be. 
>>>>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Paul,
>>>>> I recall your mentioning not having done any sharpening to the 150-450 
>>>>> examples you posted.
>>>>> I think that some moderate sharpening certainly and even a tad of ERC 
>>>>> "clarify" would be
>>>>> reasonable and more realistic. 
>>>>> I believe it's intended that digital images be sharpened.
>>>>> 
>>>>> J
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Paul Stenquist" <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 1:03:01 PM
>>>>> Subject: DFA 150-450, first impression
>>>>> 
>>>>> The 150-450 zoom arrived today. It’s dark and gloomy in Michigan and 
>>>>> raining intermittently, so I resisted the urge to go looking for birds 
>>>>> and instead set the fine focus adjustment, then took a couple of sample 
>>>>> pics. My tests showed the lens was back focusing a bit, and a +4 setting 
>>>>> brought it right in throughout the range. It’s built like a tank, there’s 
>>>>> no wobble or looseness, and the zoom is as tight as any lens i’ve ever 
>>>>> owned. (One reviewer mentioned zoom creep. If that ever was a problem, 
>>>>> it’s definitely been resolved. You have to expend a fair amount of effort 
>>>>> to change the focal length.) I shot some dead ferns off a tripod at 
>>>>> 450mm, ISO 3200, f5.6, 1/60th. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18141845&size=lg
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here’s a 100% crop of the area where I placed the focal point 
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18141846&size=lg
>>>>> 
>>>>> Very pleased thus far. Can’t wait to try it out on some birdies.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Paul
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>> follow the directions.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to