When I visited it, the linked-to page had several references to
the 645 version of the lens ('P' in the name, and an extra handle
opposite the foot), but there were also two A* K-mount versions.It's probably not that much heavier than the A* 300/2.8. On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:39:08AM +0100, Jostein ??ksne wrote: > > That baby is from the 645 lineup. > Having once played with it on the 645D, my brief and shallow impression is > that fringing is not an issue on the crop format 645D, and a total > non-starter when coupled to a K-mount camera. > > You'd have a harder time living with the sheer weight of the thing. > > Jostein > > Den 2016-01-08 05:47, skrev J.C. O'Connell: > >fringing would be less of an issue on a ff digital. > > > >On 1/7/2016 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > >>Not a bad price, but I would be concerned about fringing on digital. > >> > >>Paul via phone > >> > >>>On Jan 7, 2016, at 5:35 PM, Gonz <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>don't see this often: > >>> > >>>http://www.ebay.com/cln/contours/Pentax-A-600mm/154084719018?_trksid=p2045573.m2687.l4914&_trkparms=reqid%3Dcoll_1452205959377_-1444967556%26collectionid%3D154084719018%26pos%3D4%26pid%3D1 > >>> > >>>-- -- Reduce your Government Footprint > >>> > >>>-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>[email protected] > >>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > >>>follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
