On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
> Three words: "Jump on it!"  Assuming it's not totally beat to hell, and that

Well, I emailed him, we'll just have to see what his (why is it I always
assume everyone on the internet is mail? but, anyways..) response is,
then.

I figured it was a good price since it included the TTL and 90 LS, but I
wanted someone to tell me it was, as well. He rates it as being in good
shape, with some slight brassing and the aforementioned ding. He also says
that the body and meter was refurbished 10/01 by United Camera Repair.

> it functions properly.  From what I've been able to tell, even $450 to $500
> would be a good deal on a working 90 LS and TTL prism finder.  You may want

I realize now I forgot to ensure something I wanted to check on: the 6x7's
prism is mountable on a newer 67, right?

> to actually verify that this is in fact a ~metering~ prism.  I noticed a
> non-metering prism on eBay recently that was listed as a TTL prism finder,
> but the accompanying picture was most definitely the non-metering prism

If not, then I can either break teh deal I'm sure or lower the price.

> finder.  Take a look at the following URL to see what a non-MLU body and TTL
> prism went for a few days ago, despite the missing TTL ring on the shutter

They all look teh same to me, so.. yeah.

> I think that's too high, but I suppose it gives you an upper limit of the
> going rates.

I have the feeling I ccould've argued for less, but you know what... I
don't care. It comes in under my original limit of $700, and that was
money I'm lucky to have at all.

-g.

-- 
http://www.infotainment.org
         "The destructive character is cheerful."  - Walter Benjamin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to