On Mon, Feb 8, 2016, at 01:10 PM, Mark C wrote: > What's a Ricohflex TLR?
I'm sure PJ knows what a Ricohflex TLR is. "Ricofhlex" on the other hand.... Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ > > http://mattsclassiccameras.com/ricohflex_super.html > > The center of the frame is actually *very* sharp, but would be the area > in a square drawn by vertical and horizontal 1/3rd lines. Outside of > that area it is just sharp to soft around the edges. A light, compact > and inexpensive TLR. Finder lens is decently bright too. > > Examples - > > http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/media/blogs/photoblog2009/2013_ns_02592_tu2_L.jpg > > http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/media/blogs/calarti/2014/14-1390_tu4_L.jpg > > http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/the-not-so-distant-light > > > On 2/7/2016 4:47 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: > > Much as I'd like to ecumenical about this I'd have to say no. Any > > Ricoh camera available at the time of the Pentax brand being acquired > > by Ricoh and going forward I think should be the rule. But that's just > > me. > > > > If some one want's to use a Ricoh film body with a Pentax Lens that's > > always been allowed. > > > > What's a Ricofhlex TLR by the way? > > > > On 2/7/2016 4:32 PM, Mark C wrote: > >> Excellent gallery! Many excellent shots. Christine's "Apple Line", > >> Darren's "Long Abandoned" and Ann's "We're No Angels" stand out. > >> > >> Including Ricoh gear seems fine to me... Would that mean that mages > >> made with a Super Ricofhlex TLR would be allowed? > >> > > -- -- -- http://www.fastmail.com - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an unladen european swallow -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
