On 2/18/2016 10:45 PM, Mark C wrote:
Yeah - but 6x7 / 67 lenses are pretty big and heavy. With lens
attached the 6x7 would be quite a bit larger and heavier.
On 2/18/2016 8:28 PM, Bill wrote:
The K1 is 136.5 x 110 x 85.5 and weighs 1010 grams.
For comparison, the Pentax 67 was
177 x101 x91. and weighed 1290 grams.
bill
Just for giggles I compared the K-1 to the Canon D7 Mark II. The K-1 is
slightly narrower, slightly shorter and weighs 10% less, though it is a
bit thicker, mostly due to it's grip. Sure the Canon has astounding
performance in everything except imaging, where it lags pretty much
everybody else by a bit, but we are comparing body size of a FF camera
to an APS-C camera and the FF camera is smaller and lighter.
Now I want to say the Pentax isn't really a small camera, just small by
comparison to some of it's competition.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.