Larry, are you sure?
The entire world appears blurry... I guess it's time to sleep for me. :-)
Cheers,
Igor
PS. As for my previous more mathematical response, - I was addressing your
statement:
"Likewise, given a good model of the lens (bokeh) it might also be
possible to mathematically increase the depth of field."
And for that you do need to reconstitute the unblurred image, as the MIT
paper you referenced also suggests.
Larry Colen wrote on Fri Mar 18 11:28:51 EDT 2016:
There will always be a pathological case where it doesn't work.
Fortunately, the vast majority of things I photograph aren't, so most of
the time this would be helpful
On March 18, 2016 7:40:10 AM PDT, steve harley <pdml at paper-ape.com>
wrote:
On 2016-03-18 1:50 , Larry Colen wrote:
I didn't say that you could reconstitute the original image. I said
that
you could extract depth information. For example, the amount of blur
would
tell you that an object is + 20% or -20% of the focus point. It won't
tell
you which, but you'd know it was one or the other.
what if you are photographing a "blurry" subject?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
