Thanks, Rick, and also to everyone else who took a look.
I personally prefer the IR version but there are obviously two schools
of thought.
Mark
On 3/20/2016 6:15 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
This is another beautiful shot, but to me doesn't provoke the "Wow!" that the
IR version did. Looking back at it, the IR version seems to bring out the shape and
texture of the tree better, besides being very striking visually.
Cheers,
Rick
On Mar 20, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Mark C wrote:
Not infrared:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/tree-at-middleton-place-non
or on flickr:
https://flickr.com/photos/markcassino/25308483503
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
