On Tue, Apr 5, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Larry Colen wrote: > > > Steve Cottrell wrote: > > On 5/4/16, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > >> The 1.4 is what?<internet statistic> ~95%</internet statistic> as good > >> in depth > >> of field for less than a third of the price. Unless you want the LX > >> gold plated > >> 1.2, in which case it's even better value. > >> > >> Looks like a case of lens envy overwhelming photographic commonsense. > > > > All true. > > > > If no bargains present, then the 1.4 it will be. Actually not as cheap > > these days as they used to be! > > I bet you could pick up a 50/1.4 supertak darned cheap, and it should > work just fine on a mirrorless unit.
You can. I did. It does. Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- -- http://www.fastmail.com - The way an email service should be -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
