And if you do ever find one, let the rest of us know please.
On 5/9/2016 3:27 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
I think I have the same gigantic Tamrac. I bought it when I was
traveling to the UK about 10 years ago, and BA allowed only one
carry-on item. I also use it as a storage locker now.
A two-DSLR bag that doesn't look like a camera bag? Lots of luck.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Stanley Halpin
<[email protected]> wrote:
I have no help re your bag quest - all 7 of mine are almost but not quite
suited to the purpose but I am sure #8 will be perfect!
On May 9, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Malcolm Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm still on the search for a decent bag. The last time I bought a bag I
really liked, was a gigantic Tamrac from a list member on the south coast of
the UK (Brighton? Peter?) who I believe had a shop there and moved to Japan
(is that right?)
But I did want to confirm your recollection. It was Peter in Brighton. I too am
blocking on his full name but I spent a very pleasant day with said gentleman
wandering the byways of SE England on one of my occasional visits… His name
came up again shortly after the tsunami when Bob Sullivan was looking for
contacts in Japan who could help him establish the status of a friend who might
have been affected by the disaster.
stan
- this was many moons ago when a Pentax digital camera of
any sort was just speculation. Great bag, I store my film cameras in it etc,
but only useful otherwise day to day if you have some poor devil to cart it
around for you. I have a backpack which I got as a free gift with a DSLR
body that is too small, and another free bag which just takes a body and a
50mm lens attached.
Over the years from film, I've noticed that many bags have moved away from
being able to house two camera bodies. I assume that because you now have
variable ISO, manufactures don't feel you need to have two bodies, as you
might once have done using different film. The thing is, what I want is a
bag that is capable of housing two bodies with lenses attached and enough
room for spare batteries and all the sundries of the digital age. Many of
the places I take photos, especially in the Summer are dusty environments
(horse stables for a start), and frankly, I don't want to be changing lenses
on site. I normally have one body set up with the 16-85 & the other with a
55-300.
What I am fed up doing, is carrying a bag which doesn't suit, and a shopping
bag for the other camera. I don't really want a larger backpack, or a bag
which screams that it contains camera equipment inside. I'm not sure there
is anything out there that fits the job I want done.
Any ideas?
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
