Beautifully done, Christine!

J

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 16, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Christine Aguila <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I most certainly did write this. And my husband just said I represented him 
> well!
> 
> Cheers, Christine 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On May 16, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Christine, did you write this?
>> Cute piece, well written!
>> 
>> J
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On May 16, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Christine Aguila <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On May 15, 2016, at 9:24 PM, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 5/15/2016 7:54 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On May 14, 2016 7:50:46 PM PDT, Bill <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> The local pusher had their annual dog and pony show today, so I got to
>>>>>>> play with a couple of the new lenses for the K1.
>>>>>>> This one was shot with the 15-30. Not much to say about it, other than
>>>>>>> that it's a brick wall.
>>>>>>> The lens is nicely balanced to the camera, and seems very, very sharp.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/brickwall.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> K1, 15-30mm zoom, f/2.8 1/2000 at ISO 100.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Earlier today, I had a look at this lens on the Pentax web site, and I 
>>>>> thought, that’s a lens for me.  Today I shot indoors with the DA 15-45mm 
>>>>> & a flash and was so frustrated with the autofocusing.  I’m assuming the 
>>>>> 15-30mm would be better for indoor autofocusing.  I may try to rent one 
>>>>> for a few days to try it out.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The other thing I’m going to do this summer is practice my manual 
>>>>> focusing skills.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers, Christine
>>>> 
>>>> The AF indoors with this lens on the K1 was just fine. I didn't try it on 
>>>> any other cameras.
>>>> I'm going to enable you a little bit here. If you use manual focus a lot, 
>>>> the K1 is definitely a much improved camera over the K3 (I can't speak to 
>>>> the K3II). For manual focus, the K1 is definitely in a class of it's own 
>>>> due to the focus assists that are built in.
>>>> 
>>>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/greyhall.html
>>>> 
>>>> Another nothing shot, but the AF was in center point, I suspect it focused 
>>>> on the far wall.
>>> 
>>> You know, I had the talk with my husband last night:
>>> 
>>> not the one where you casually mention, while he’s reading the paper, how a 
>>> specific piece of kit just came out, and you wax it’s virtues, then 
>>> casually and most strategically dismiss it by saying, “well, maybe down the 
>>> road”;
>>> 
>>> nor the one (which comes two weeks later) where you mention how said kit 
>>> would be really great to address some specific shooting situation you plan 
>>> to experience in the near future;
>>> 
>>> and nor the one where you come home (three weeks later) with said piece of 
>>> kit and you proceed to rationalize your purchase with arguments so 
>>> persuasive even Aristotle would be impressed.
>>> 
>>> No, not any of those.
>>> 
>>> The other one, where you begin while cuddled under the blankets after a 
>>> good day of married life, and he’s just about ready to slip off dreaming 
>>> how lucky he is to have a wife who made him his favorite meal and served it 
>>> with his favorite ale—
>>> 
>>> The one where you begin: “Honey, do you know what a full frame camera is?”
>>> 
>>> Yes, that one, which is not just about another camera body, but rather 
>>> about a new trajectory in camera equipment enablement.  The one where you 
>>> do your best to load him down with technical explanations so expert you 
>>> make him dizzy, and you do this when his desire for blissful sleep is high, 
>>> yet because he’s a good husband, he’s trying hang on and take an interest. 
>>> But, of course, he can’t hang on any longer as you prattle on, and you hear 
>>> him slipping into dreamland saying, “Sounds like a good plan, dear.  Can’t 
>>> wait to see the pictures.”
>>> 
>>> Then the two of you drift off into a very lovely sleep.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers, Christine
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to