Thanks to all who looked and commented - for Bob W, yup, scanned with an Epson 
V500: I set Dust
Removal and Grain Reduction to medium and resolution to 2400dpi.  One of the 
reasons I used FP4 a
lot was the very fine grain and good sharpness that could be produced using 
Acutol as the developer.


John in Brisbane



-----Original Message-----
From: PDML [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob W-PDML
Sent: Friday, 20 May 2016 17:31
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives

That looks very good. Is it scanned from the neg?

B

> On 20 May 2016, at 08:24, John Coyle <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do 
> much wet processing of older photos, particularly given the size of 
> the archive, which goes back 49 years!  So, now I am scanning only 
> those worth preserving and probably leaving to my son, as they will be the 
> main family history
photos.  The link below is of a shot I just scanned from 1972 - I think the 
quality holds up well.
> 
> http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~jcoyle/PESO15.html
> 
> Comments welcome
> 
> 
> 
> John in Brisbane
> 
> 
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to