Larry Colen wrote: > > >Bob W-PDML wrote: >> On 19 Jun 2016, at 13:45, Mark Roberts<[email protected]> wrote: >>> The one thing that bothers me about the K-1 is something that I >>> haven't seen anyone else mention: The ISO settings only go down to >>> 100. I *hate* fscking around with ND filters and I dislike using >>> diffraction-inducing small apertures, both of which I found necessary >>> at GFM a few weeks ago when I wanted 30-second (or longer) exposure >>> times. >>> >>> [...] >> >> It's the cosmos's way of telling you not to do any more blurry stream photos. >> >> Do any sensors go below ISO100? > >According to the video, native ISO on the K-1 is actually 50, rather >than 100. It'll be interesting to see what DxO says it is.
Hmm. I just compared the metering of my K-1 (in center-weighted mode) to my Sekonik L-308 and consistently get readings showing the K-1 to be about a full stop *more* sensitive than indicated. In other words, it's behaving as if its actual base ISO is 200. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
