Paul -I'm sure you must know I'm not opposed to post processing in
general - but I think this work is really quite awful. Post-processing
for its own sake.
We are entering the digital imaging age equivalent to Keane portraitsand
tigers on black velvet, it seems to me.
ann
On 8/3/2016 10:31 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Post processing isn't sad. It requires skill and artistry. I'm not wild about
this grungy look, but I appreciate the creative process.
Paul via phone
On Aug 3, 2016, at 10:22 PM, ann sanfedele <[email protected]> wrote:
Sadly, John - there is a lot of post processing in these
ann
On 8/3/2016 3:33 PM, John wrote:
It's street portraiture, and you don't do it in post. You set up or find
"Rembrandt" type lighting before you make the photo. It also looks like
she's shooting for fairly high contrast, low key lighting.
On 8/2/2016 4:33 PM, Gonz wrote:
I've seen several galleries like this, where they have a certain
"Rembrandt" like quality to them. How do they post process to get this?
http://www.trendsandlife.com/artistic-photographs-homeless-people-facing-challenges-streets/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
