> On 17 August 2016 at 20:51 Jostein <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Multicoating could indeed be an issue. Flares could be terrible if too 
> much light was bouncing off the specimen mounting plate.
> One site I found describes the resolution of microscope optics as fairly 
> uniform across brands and time, but dependent on glass technology. The 
> three major classes of tech are "Plan achromat", "plan fluorite" and 
> "plan apochromat". The apochromat seems in general to resolve twice as 
> fine details as do the achromat, with the fluorite in the middle.
> 
> I suspect the microscope objectives will have the edge over camera 
> optics at higher magnification.
> 
> Btw, you may want to check this (awesome stuff) out on occasion:
> http://microsculpture.net/
> 
> He apparently use a microscope objective mounted in front of another 
> photographic lens.

Looks like he lights his subjects as carefully and intricately as does (did)
Playboy.

> 
> Jostein
> 
> 
> Den 16.08.2016 17.28, skrev mike wilson:
> >> On 15 August 2016 at 20:21 Jostein <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> One more in the category of tiny monsters.
> >>
> >> http://www.alunfoto.no/innhold/beetleface/
> >>
> >> I have now worked through five of the old 4X microscope lenses Mike W.
> >> brought me, and found that none of them can match the detail resolution
> >> of a reversed Pentax-M 28mm f/2.8 stopped down to f/5.6. The Pentax is a
> >> little soft in the contrast rendering, though, so maybe the A-series
> >> edition is better.
> >
> > Most of those lenses will predate (in design if not manufacture) the camera
> > lens
> > and I don't think any of them will be multicoated.
> >
> >>
> >> To explore further options, a Pentax-K 24mm f/3.5 has just been ordered
> >> through eBay. :-)
> >>
> >> Interesting times. Another, more systematic study of the 10X lenses
> >> coming up, but not in a couple of weeks. School has just started here,
> >> and I'm busy getting to know my new students.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to