I doubt they'll reverse their decision. The HTML hosting aspect is not their core business, is most likely an accidental feature/side-effect, adds a measurable load to their servers, and probably is abused by "warez" or porn providers. It's also possible they are planning an internal architecture change that is incompatible in some way with the HTML hosting so killing it officially now avoids a huge load of support calls later on.
It's inconvenient, but there are other free places to stuff random html. Maybe Google Sites would work for you? https://sites.google.com/ On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:08 PM, P.J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone using Dropbox to display their photographs using an HTML page or for > that matter gallery software such as jalbum should complain. I don't know > if they will reverse the decision, but it's worth a try anyway. > > > -- > I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve > immortality through not dying. > -- Woody Allen > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
