No, I meant the two front ducks (the 3rd one is also, but that's
understandable, it's slightly outside of DOF.
I think I found a partial problem. For some reason,
Firefox shows the image at a slightly large size then what it is in
reality. So, it is dynamically upscaling it. And that is likely resulting
in the apparent softness. It is not happening in other browsers.
(I just realized, - my browser had some small zoom value, probably 110%.)
However, I still see that some parts of the two front ducks are not very
sharp. E.g. the breast of the brown one is sort of blurred.
I am not sure if it is a motion blur, the resolution limitation of the
lens, or a very narrow DoF. It might be a combination of several factors.
What was the focal length and the aperture for this shot?
It's a nice catch in any case!
Jack Davis Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:46:14 -0700 wrote:
Reply#2: Yes, the grass in the foreground and ducks and grasses in the
background are soft, but the
plain of the primary subjects is
really all that mattered to me in
this "off hand" casual catch.
Is that what you're seeing?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 14, 2016, at 11:00 AM, Igor PDML-StR <pdml...@komkon.org> wrote:
It's a nice catch and composition.
I don't know if it is my browser or what, but it looks softish.
I'd try to sharpen it a bit (or at least to apply "unsharp" filter or
it's cousin "Presence/Clariry" in LR.
BTW, the caption is misspelled. :)
Jack Davis Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:50:21 -0700 wrote:
Shot a few days ago at Colusa Ntl Refuge.
Comments most welcome!
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow