Very interesting On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Steve Cottrell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22/11/16, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Love the photograph, Cotty, but the rendering in the principal area of >>interest seems a bit too dark. I'd want to lighten up the area around >>the bridegroom's face and shoulder a little bit so that I could see his >>expression and gesture. There's enough meat in the photo, even the >>online JPEG, to do it and it makes the photo much more compelling, IMO. > > Wow - how interesting. > > My interpretation is totally the opposite. I find that my interest is > only in the faces of the men doing the work. In fact I found myself not > caring at all what they were even doing - just that they were > concentrating with such intent. I have other shots that show the group > as a proper 'four' but chose this one for the very reason you point out > - that the object of their attention is dark, almost insignificant. In > this case, I found the principal are of interest was the three men > standing (their faces) with the sitter a quick glance and nothing more. > > As Spock would say - fascinating. > > Thanks for the comments. > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, > || (O) | Web Video Production > ---------- <www.seeingeye.tv> > _____________________________ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- -- Reduce your Government Footprint -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
