Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
:-)
I'm a bit older than you. I've been wearing progressives since around age 47 or so,
fifteen years ago. They work great for me, as long as I'm not working on a large screen
computer display ... then I have bifocal splits that give me 22" and 14" in
focus.
I've been wearing progressives since I was about 48, I probably should
have gotten them a year or two earlier. It's just annoying that my older
glasses no longer work just fine, it's even more annoying that my vision
no longer corrects to as good as it once did, or that I get ranges where
my eyes just won't focus, even with the progressives.
I've never cared whether I wore glasses... regular, progressives, or bifocals.
I just want to see: to read, to do my photography, and to enjoy the beauty of
life. Whatever it takes to see is all that matters.
What else is important, really?
G
On Dec 18, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Larry Colen<[email protected]> wrote:
I have come to the unpleasant realization that as much as I enjoy obtaining new
lenses, the next pair of lenses that I need to buy will not be K-mount but
eyeglasses.
Last week, when I was trying to adjust the temples, my eyeglasses snapped in
half. Unfortunately, my spare glasses just don't seem to work. I went thirty
years with my prescription barely changing, and now in my fifties and in the
era of progressive lenses, glasses just a few years out of date make it hard to
read the text on my computer screen, much less process photos.
This rant brought to you by the letter F, no that's an R, wait, it's a P,
definitely a P.
--
Larry Colen [email protected] (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
