I don't know. The 70/200 is obviously good and a stop faster than the 60-250, but I already have the latter. I may sell it and the 50-135 some day, but I'm not in a hurry.
Paul via phone > On Dec 18, 2016, at 11:25 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrot > 59-145 > > Paul Stenquist wrote: >> The 60-260 vignettes a bit on full frame, but It's not enough to trouble me. >> It's been my go to lens for years now on aps-c and full frame. It's >> excellent. The 150-450 is astounding. But it's much bigger and heavier. If >> you're serious about shooting critters, go for the 150-450 and a good >> tripod. But it's not a walk around lens. The 60-250/4 is > > How does the 60-250 compare with the 70-200? > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
