Thanks. And thanks everyone else for comments. However I won't be awarding any post-modernism points this time round because none of you pointed out the self-referencing, or the questioning of the gaze, or the mise-en-abyme implied by the apparent 35mm film strip in this one: http://www.web-options.com/TateJan17/content/L1000522_large.html
B On 23 Jan 2017, at 19:13, Chris Mitchell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Nicely done. You have a good camera. Chris On 22 January 2017 at 20:25, Bob W-PDML <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: http://www.web-options.com/TateJan17/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
