I don't think so, the only thing retro about the KP is the shape of the
"pentaprism" housing, and that's not particularly retro based on
physics. I doubt even Ricoh, (ex Pentax), marketing could mistake the
Nikon Df as a top sales leader.
On 1/26/2017 11:38 AM, John wrote:
On 1/25/2017 8:18 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
There is no meaningful size difference between a KP and K-5.
http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,187
Ditto the KP and K-3 just in case anyone cared...
http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,485
I think this may be the more meaningful comparison:
http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,495
The KP seems to have that same retro look.
Comment on DPReview, "Looks like a mini-Pentax 67 (LOL)"
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
