I just did a set of my front yard with the K-3. Oops, bracketing starts
at 400 rather than 100, but it's still about the same. I can't help but
wonder if there is something about the way your version of lightroom
processes images.
Gonz wrote:
I still like the better exposed image though, the color rendition is
more natural to my eye.
I wonder if the different color channels have different nonlinearities
so that as you get further from nominal exposure you have to adjust the
white balance differently.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Gonz<[email protected]> wrote:
Here it is with autotoning:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/32179978780/in/dateposted-public/
Much better...
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Gonz<[email protected]> wrote:
Those are very good Larry. Much better performance with the K-1 IMO.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Larry Colen<[email protected]> wrote:
I just tried a quick test with the K-1. I initially bracketed five shots, 2
stops per frame, Tav, set to -2 EV, which gave me -6, -4, -2, 0 and +2,
however my lightroom will only correct up to 5 stops, so I dropped the -6
EV.
Four presses of the shutter, two of some shelf lichen in my front yard and
two of the river in my back yard. Only correction in lightroom is nominal
exposure correction.
On flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157675962146534
On fluidr so you can see the exif next to each shot:
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157675962146534
Unfortunately that didn't give me base ISO, I may try fiddling with things
to see if I can get another set that starts at ISO 100.
--
Larry Colen [email protected] (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
