Mark,
Very happy to read your considerations about macro. I had thoughts along 
similar lines, but actually for extreme macro studio work. Controlling 
vibration at 4X and beyond can be a pain. A setup that requires less 
magnification to fill the frame could be a good thing if the image quality is 
good enough. And the central shutter design and faster flash sync speed could 
also help reducing vibrations.

This could be fun. :-) 

Jostein 

Den 2. juni 2017 01.11.20 CEST, skrev Mark C <[email protected]>:
>I have the original Q, not the Q7. It's a fun system though I haven't 
>used mine in a long time. Back in the days when I traveled for my job I
>
>took the Q kit on the road with me -camera , fisheye, normal zoom and 
>tele-zoom - a small, light but versatile kit.
>
>And as an update to the copy of this reply that I accidentally sent 
>directly to you -  the IQ is decent, more than adequate for web based 
>images and good enough for smaller prints, though its best to keep the 
>ISO as low as possible. The Q7 sensor is about 50% larger than the 
>original Q in terms of surface area, so the IQ should be a bit better.
>
>IMO - one niche for the Q is for macro in the field. Let's say you have
>
>a gnat that is 6mm from head to toe and you want a photo of it as you 
>are hiking along. Pull out the Q, put on a K to Q adapter and a 1:1 
>macro lens, shoot at f2.8 to f5.6. Very easy setup to carry and deploy 
>and at f 2.8 to f5.6 you could probably keep the ISO fairly low and
>have 
>decent DOF  but some diffraction limit on sharpness.  But on APS-C or 
>full frame the gnat would need 4x to 6x magnification. Not so easy for 
>field work.  For this kind of macro work, the Q / Q7 can let you get a 
>decent shot (not great) where you are not likely to get any shot at all
>
>using APS-C or full frame.
>
>Mark
>
>On 6/1/2017 1:29 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
>> Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any
>other users here?
>> Jostein

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to