My point was that for the subject mentioned in the original post (5 inches 
filling a 35mm frame) the lenses he had would do it.  There is no need to buy 
anything extra for what he wants to do now.

Sure later on he may want to get more junk but maybe he'll never need it 
again.

Christian

On Thursday 23 May 2002 15:55, Bill D. Casselberry  wrote:
>
>
>       You'd do well to pick up some extension tubes, anyway. You
>       may find a combination w/ your 200mm that could be to your
>       liking. A little extension on a 200mm really reduces the
>       close focus ability and doesn't drasticly reduce viewing
>       ability TTL. Makes for an excellent "close-in" set-up which
>       you will undoubtedly like enough to use often and justify
>       the purchase of the extension tube/tubes. Results would, I
>       suspect, be superior to using one of the zooms.  But you
>       didn't hear me inserting anything into the "Zoom vs Prime"
>       debacle ( ... er, I mean debate) here.    ;^)
>
>       Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to