Fair enough. Not understanding the language, I didnt know the descriptions just stated the obvious - they may have mentioned other characteristics of the lenses or preferences of the reviewers. Yes the lines are self explanatory, although when they are very similar from one lens to another, it is difficult to judge accurately which is better.
Thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 May 2002 14:03 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: MTF charts pentax vs Nikon for 100macro and 135mm > > > which parts of the charts do you want translated -- solid or broken > lines? > <g> > seriously, 99% of the charts are self explanatory, and the > text doesn't > say much other than stating the obvious. tamron: very good resolution > wide open. sigma: quite contrasty with very convincing resolution wide > open, with a very nice peak in the corners. > > que le vaya bien, > > mishka > > > From: Rob Brigham > > Subject: RE: MTF charts pentax vs Nikon for 100macro and 135mm > > Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 02:36:27 -0700 > > > > -------- > > > > Any chance of a translation of the text from anyone? > Particlarly the > > Pentax, Sigma and Tamron offerings - although it would be > interesting > > > to have the lot translated... > > > > ta > > > > Rob > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > http://launch.yahoo.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
