I suspect it is not just "publicity", but direct money earning.
If you were to look at his videos, - he is clearly in the business of
earning "click" money from his Youtube videos.
So, I suspect Mark's hypothesis as well as Ann and Rob's
clarifications are correct.
It's all consistent with his M.O.:
I listened to a portion of some other video where he apologizes for using
a dirty language in some prior videos, with lots of blubbering about
nothing.
ann sanfedele Wed, 25 Oct 2017 05:36:08 -0700 wrote:
Performance art?
On 10/25/2017 8:11 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
He definitely got some YouTube mileage out of it, isn't that the old
saying;
There is no such thing as bad publicity
On 25 October 2017 at 22:59, Mark Roberts <[email protected]>
wrote:
https://www.diyphotography.net/internet-entrepreneur-shocked-copyright-owner-sued-stealing-work/
I showed this video to my students on Monday night and everyone
enjoyed it. And some important points about copyright were
clarified.
But after having a couple of days to think about it I'm
suspicious. He
claims his lawyer told him not to make this video but he obviously
did
any way and it's still on line after a couple of weeks - even
though
he explicitly calls the person who sued him "malicious" (though
without naming the party whose copyright he infringed). He doesn't
seem like the kind of guy who would be able to shrug off a $35k
lawsuit loss as just an annoying business expense.
I'm starting to suspect this is just a publicity grab and this guy
was
never sued at all.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
