Today marks ten years since I brought my K100Dsuper home from San Jose Camera. A few months previously I had upgraded my Lumix FZ20 to an FZ50, which was in many ways a brilliant piece of kit. The zoom and focus rings on the barrel acted just like they would on a "real camera", the UI was overall wonderful to use, the lens was awesome, and in good light the image quality was great. However, in lower light, the small size of the sensor showed its weaknesses, so when the FZ50 was lost when my girlfriend's car was stolen (we got the car back but not the stuff in it), I decided to look at low end DSLRs. My theory was that I'd just buy an inexpensive camera, maybe not even buy much in the way of lenses for it, because I figured that in a few years camera bodies with the performance I wanted would become affordable.

My first forays to Best Buy and the ilk made it obvious that I really disliked the low end Canon. The kit lens was so bad that feel of zooming and focusing practically made my lens crawl. Someone with a website, who seemed to know what he was talking about (I won't mention who but his last name rhymes with Rockwell) waxed eloquent about the Nikon D40.

I wandered into San Jose Camera, planning on buying a D40, and the salesman was talking about the advantages of Canon over Nikon. I was mulling this over because I really did not like the Canon when I overheard him discussing the Pentax with another customer. It turns out that using my legacy Nikon glass on the D40 was not trivial, the Pentax had the same sensor as the D40, built in image stabilization, a nicer kit lens, and cost less.

Long story shortened, I brought the K100 home, went from shooting maybe a couple hundred frames a month to wandering about with the camera any time I had a few minutes to kill and averaging about 100 a day. That weekend I realized that the kit lens on the K100 simply didn't work for low light dance photography and I ordered an FA31 the following week.

I suppose I could put together a collection that is a serious ten year retrospective, but I'm feeling lazy, so here's a set that goes almost that far back:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157682830861601/

And for more of the earlier, here's a book I put together just about seven years ago of my first three years since I got back into photography
http://www.blurb.com/b/1790067-three-years

I had spent some time hanging out in other fora, mostly the DP Pentax forum before I met John Francis and he pointed me at the PDML, so y'all can blame him. The PDML struck me as one of the few places where people who actually knew how to use their cameras outnumbered those that didn't. In most of the other fora, folks who had been using a DSLR for about six months and had recently learned how to use fast glass and misuse the word bokeh were the experts that gave everyone else advice.

I found that looking at other people's photos, and particularly reading the critiques of them helped my own photography tremendously. Also when taking a photo that wasn't in a style I normally shot thinking about how someone in particular from PDML who did a lot of that sort of photography was a great place for me to start when figuring out how to take it.

In some ways it's kind of a silly anniversary to mark, but I do want to credit and thank y'all for the help in whatever artistic (if not social) growth I've managed to achieve in the past decade.

--
Larry Colen  [email protected] (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to