> On Dec 18, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Eric Featherstone <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm not an expert but when I looked at "One that was not" my first > thought was camera shake. I would have thought that a focal length of > 87mm @ 1/125 second would have been ok but it looks shaky to me. > > Oddly the "One that was improved by editing" has no camera shake even > at a fl of 225mm @ 1/125 s, which is where I would expect shake to > start to come into play. So clearly you can hold it steady. > > And then when I saw the Fuji shot my first thought was "Hey, come on, > you're not being fair at all" :-) > The Pentax shots were indoors in dull dim light, the Fuji outside in > bright sunlight; of course the Fuji shot will pop more. > That's in addition to what people have said about pro lens vs > consumer, and short lens vs long etc. > > But that's just my guesses.
Pretty good guesses, Eric. They’re instructive. And I agree I’m not being fair, though I didn’t know that before the earlier comments on this thread. Just one demurrer: not all the Fuji shots were outdoors in the sun. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA [email protected] "The invincible shield of caring Is a weapon sent from the sky against being dead." - Tao Te Ching 67 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
