The TVs all have a display mode meant to really pop in brightly lit stores. That’s why they’re oversaturated. You can dial them in to any level you prefer, and video buff sites frequently have recommended settings for different brands. A 44 inch TV is very affordable these days. LG OLED models seem to be the best right now, but most major brands of 4K TVs are very good. http://www.lg.com/us/tvs/all-tvs?&cmpid=sem_(HE)-TV-AON-GGL-Srch-Brand-TV-General-EXT_best-lg-tv&gclid=CLm3jcuq8dgCFYGhgQodvvIKlA&gclsrc=ds
> On Jan 24, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have been seriously considering doing something I've never done before, > buying a TV. I don't watch much TV and all of mine have been hand me downs. > I almost bought one about 15 years ago, but then my dad passed away and I > inherited his. > > My ideal would be to get a 4K (UHD) in the 30-40 inch range that would work > well for displaying my photos when it's not being used for movies and TV. > Since I'm at least within radio hailing distance of the real world, cost is a > serious consideration. I've seen 4K TVs for around $300, but the images on > them at the store are always over saturated, and pretty bad looking, but that > might be due to source material that they try to make "pop". > > The other option would be to get something cheap until I could afford > something better a ways down the line. What sort of technology should I look > for and what would I need to pay to get it? > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
