Hi Bruce,
thanks for the comments, constructive criticism is always
appreciated (downright flattery has its place too, but only in terms of
encouragement). I'll have a good hard look at the framed print (12x16), and
see if I can visualise it the way you suggest. Another person's view point
is so helpful in suggesting other possibilities.
I crammed in a lot of different poses and styles in that one session as it
was one of the first ones I did and I was doing a lot of experimenting. To
tell the truth I still am experimenting most of the time, but do know a few
more things to
avoid now.
thanks again,
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Ewins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: Re[2]: May PUG Review from Cotty
> Paul,
>
> So, if you are wanting comments, I'll bite. As I passed through all
> the images the other day, there were so many good shots that I
> couldn't comment on all of them. There were several that I almost
> commented on and this was one of them.
>
> I like the general lighting. It accents differently than standard
> shots. The fading softness on her front side is flattering and rather
> makes you want to see more images from different angles - perhaps a
> good lead in photo to a session. The pose is both good and bad for
> me. It accentuates her front side very well, but does make her right
> arm seem too dominant. I wonder if rather than hands directly on the
> hips, just a slight move forward so you still get the effect but let
> her hands come just a bit forward (perhaps against her belly) to fade
> with the rest.
>
> I'd love to see round #2.
>
>
> Bruce
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
