Interesting. When I had my Pentax 6X7, the image quality was outstanding. Mostly, however, I made contacts and then had enlargement printed. I had only 2 lenses for it, both primes.
Did you really mean to say you had been using DSLR cameras for 45 years? I didn't think they have been around that long. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: > Last year I was given a Pentax 67, it took me until a couple weeks ago to > finish the first roll of Porta 400. Unfortunately, when Bay scanned it, > they scanned it square, so I need to bring it in for rescanning. > > Here are the photos with the horizon straightened, color balance and > exposure tweaked. They seem to be scanned at about 200dpi which may be > higher resolution than the grain at about 30MP. > > Photographing with this camera doesn't have the comfortable flow of using > the 35mm DSLR that I've had for 45 years. The general image quality seems > to be a bit lower than that of an APS DSLR, except maybe in really bright > light. I've got a second roll of film that I'll try to shoot a lot more > promptly, but at the very least, using this is really making me appreciate > my K-1. > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/albums/72157699216746255 > > -- > Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/collections/72157612824732477/ > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
