cant speak for the 100, but I have the 135 and its outstanding. Only goes to 1:3.2 though without tubes. JCO
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jan van Wijk > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:11 PM > To: Pentax discussion forum > Subject: MF: Pentax 67 macro lenses > > > Hi, > > Looking through the list of 67 lenses, I notice two macro's: > > 1) The 100 mm > > 2) The 135 mm > > What is the difference between them in handling and magnification ratio ? > > Can either of the two do 1:1 without tubes ? > > TIA, Jan van Wijk > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
