The only time you are just looking at film, is when you 
are just looking at film (slides). When you look at 
prints you are looking at a combination of the film, the 
paper, the print machine settings and the operator.
You prpbably could have taken your film to another place 
and seen just the opposite look.


>I'm shocked how different these films came out-
>same day, same lighting and the RG has much, much
>more color saturation and contrast- the Fuji looks
>positively flat in comparison. Strange thing is, the
>RG also looks like it is one stop slower than the
>Fuji. Is this due to the contrast?

How does Portra 400 in NC and VC formulations compare?
Is Portra the "new" RG?

Taka
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to