Jostein Øksne wrote: >The istD is still a good camera. Software has come a long way in fifteen years. >The camera I miss the most is actually the K10D. It had very special raw >files, with its sensor oversampling technique.
Oh yeah. The K-10D had a nice "look" to its images. Not nearly as mush dynamic range as today's sensors and obviously a bit noisier, but wonderful when used within its limits. As is the ist-D sensor, of course. >It's a nice image too, Mark. Love the play of sunlight and shadow across the >landscape. I suppose that's the real point: When the light is good most of the job is taken care of for you, no matter what camera/sensor you're using. >>https://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d500929.jpg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
