Here's the message that keeps bombing. > On 06 July 2019 at 16:48 "P. J. Alling" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's PetaPixel, two sentences in and I want to take an ax to the > author. Read the first comment and I want to hunt down and slowly > torture the commenter to death. What a great way to start my Saturday.
I had the uncharacteristically generous thought that it might be badly (and possibly incompletely) translated. Still, it seems only that someone has characterised the formula for construction of a secondary aspherical element to further reduce SA. I find it difficult to believe that a) none of the lens manufacturers' designers haven't done this already and b) it will make a substantial difference to sharpness in the real world. > > On 7/6/2019 4:31 AM, Larry Colen wrote: > > Mathematical discovery of a solution to spherical aberration. Mind you > > it does nothing for the other sorts of aberrations on PDML, but it's a > > start. > > > > https://petapixel.com/2019/07/05/goodbye-aberration-physicist-solves-2000-year-old-optical-problem/?fbclid=IwAR0Cy8-f3MX4PqBv4uK-NcvRj0j9BaSF4fFoBmBF65-jS5QntUhNkUmgsws > > > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
