Sadly Facebook takes full advantage of people who don't understand that.

On 5/26/2020 11:53 AM, Bob Pdml wrote:
The person who wrote the article has not given any reasons why they think the 
judgement is “silly” and appears not to have understood either the GDPR or the 
ruling, even though they highlight the key facts that make this more than just 
a personal and family matter.

Social media platforms normally give themselves the right to use photographs 
for commercial purposes and leave the burden of obtaining suitable permissions 
to the person who posted them.

Parents have a right and a duty to look after their children’s interests, and 
if they don’t want people posting the children’s pictures on the internet then 
that should be the end of it really. Tough on granny, but she needs to get a 
grip - posting something on Facebook is not the same as showing your friends a 
family album over a glass of amontillado and a plate of biscuits.


On 26 May 2020, at 16:29, Daniel J. Matyola <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote:

https://abovethelaw.com/2020/05/court-tells-grandma-to-delete-photos-of-grandkids-on-facebook-for-violating-the-gdpr/?utm_campaign=ATL%20Weekly&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=88483188&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-88RUL2bNJO6cm5xh5kd5V3YMgiw5AYajWRN8MbLScEDYwgwUunXTDXMo1GSTv4lP4Ew1pA8rfIGjPZbcUfVfspHa7LaA&_hsmi=88483188

--
Any idiot can shoot with a Canon, Nikon, or Sony, it takes a special kind of 
idiot to use a Pentax.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to