I dont have any macs for desktop use. Lightroom on win10 is resource
hungry. I just wanted to mention that installing a moderate gpu with more
than average memory is a good idea. I cant give benchmark numbers. Develop
mode feels much faster.
Ps  the intel gpu only uses shared memory on pc's no idea if mac and intel
is different.

On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, 21:58 Godfrey DiGiorgi, <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have my 2012 Mac mini i7-quad core @ 2.3Ghz @1T SSD right here too. The
> new 2018-2019 mini runs rings around it too … The old one tested the same
> way takes about 7.5 seconds per raw file conversion and output compared to
> the new one at just about 2 seconds, averaged. And the editing experience
> is much slower, about 3-5 seconds per new file selected, when compared
> against the new one as well.
>
> The memory use numbers for LR on the old system is very very similar to
> the memory use numbers for the new system, never actually exceeding 7G RAM.
>
> This doesn't give me any info at all, however, trying to compare the
> performance of my current Lightroom on Mac mini performance with Toine and
> Henk's Lightroom on PC computers with respect to memory use and rendering
> performance. That's what I was looking to understand.
>
> Lightroom does seem to recognize the i7-six core onboard GPU (Intel UHD
> Graphics 630, Metal-compatible) and allows me to turn on performance
> enhancement, but it is a little shy on GPU RAM at 1.5G rather than the 2.0G
> minimum on the Adobe web page that's recommended. I see a small boost in
> the frame-to-frame performance with the GPU performance enhancement turned
> on when I'm scrolling or doing a rendering adjustment, but it moves by so
> fast that watching the numbers in Activity Monitor doesn't show anything
> and I don't have the performance analyzer software I used to have (which
> would capture a trace on a much higher sampling rate basis) installed any
> more.
>
> G
>
> > On Jul 9, 2020, at 7:44 AM, Ralf R Radermacher <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Am 09.07.20 um 16:26 schrieb Godfrey DiGiorgi:
> >
> >> ...Intel UHD Graphics 630 display driver...
> >> I did a test of rendering out 100 Hasselblad 907x 50 Mpixel raw files
> with the GPU graphics acceleration on and off, zero difference ... and the
> GPU indicator is never non-0.
> >
> > That's because the Intel graphics isn't a proper GPU. Mac Minis don't
> > have any real graphics acceleration.
> >
> > I have a Mac Mini (late 2012) and a MBP (mid 2012) both with a i7 at 2.3
> > GHz and 16 GB of RAM. The Mini has the usual Intel graphics and the MBP
> > has the Intel graphics plus a built-in NVIDIA GForce GT650M. It runs
> > circles around the Mini with things like creating thumbnails on import
> > in Lightroom.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to