On Sat, 08 Jun 2002 10:46:08 -0400, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote: >Actually, I'm not disputing the reality in this instance (though I'm also >not confirming it). I must say that I am happy to hear of people speaking >of images in terms of reality (i.e., truth value). Does the existence of >the MPEG to you mean that it is 'real'? Is this because an MPEG is >difficult to fake at the moment because of technological limitations? (In >other words, does reality correspond with perceived difficulty of being >faked?)
Go argue with someone else, okay? Later, Gary - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
