I spend many enjoyable hours in the digital darkroom using PhotoShop, and I don't own a digital camera. Scanning film provides another layer to the process. I can look at my machine prints, then scan the negative with my ultimate goal in mind. Then, it's on to PhotoShop. I wouldn't want to start with a digital image of my subject that was produced by an inferior picture taking mechanism. Paul
Tonghang Zhou wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Steve Desjardins wrote: > > > be inexpensive and allow you to only print what you want. The best part > > of digital is not the camera but the ability to use Photoshop, since it > > gives many of us a new capability, i.e., the ability to correct our own > > color images. > > > > Just my two cents . . . > > > > > > Steven Desjardins > > Anything can use photoshop, you just need a scanner. > > I see the real advantage of digital camera being the instant-feedback > and shoot as many as you want to experiement capability. You can't > do this with film. > > An acquaintance once mentioned this: with his new digital camera, > he shoots a lot of pictures, way more than he otherwise would. > > What more need one say? > > Tonghang. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
