> But I read the last paragraph, as suggested at the beginning. Did you?
Yes :) It's so full of pseudo science you cannt read it normally to the end. The before after slider picture is the funniest On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 21:01, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > Of course there’s an illusion of 3D. But it’s not the result of lens design > secrets. Just limited DOF on big glass. > > Paul > > > On Sep 27, 2020, at 2:35 PM, Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That is certainly true, Paul, but there is no denying the illusion of 3D. > > > > Dan Matyola > > *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery > > <https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery>* > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 12:46 PM Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> What is seen as 3D “pop” is just limited depth of field. And because > >> primes generally have a larger app wide open than zooms, they give you more > >> control over DOF. > >> > >> Paul > >> > >> > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > > follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
