On 22 Nov 2020, at 02:34, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> […]
> I know that there are a few folks on this list that also have u4/3 systems 
> I’m curious about the most cost effective u4/3 body that handles like a real 
> camera, and how much it would set me back.  I expect that it would be 
> something used to keep an eye out for in the usual places.  It’s not that I 
> have the money for one, but it’s generally better to start looking sooner 
> rather than later.
> 
> My impression is that the OMDs are some of the nicer ones to use.

I have an OMD E-M1 MkII and several lenses. The whole system is very good 
indeed and I like the cameras and lenses a lot. 

I haven’t taken the E-M1 on a multi-day bike tour yet, but I did make my E3 
(4/3rds but not micro 4/3rds) on a couple of trips to France a few years ago in 
a Domke F5 strapped to the handlebars. That worked quite well but the camera 
and lens were a bit bulky, and the bag is not meant to be strapped to a bike 
and I wore a hole in it.

I’ve been carrying the E-M1 on day trips in a Crumpler insert inside a proper 
handlebar bag 
(https://www.sjscycles.co.uk/luggage/gilles-berthoud-handlebar-bag-gb905-black-53-litre/)
 which also fits other bits and pieces such as my wallet, phone, glasses, map 
and compass, sandwich and so on. This works well. This set-up will take the 
body and my 12-40/2.8 lens, but that combo is quite bulky so I bought a pancake 
zoom 
(https://www.olympus.co.uk/site/en/c/lenses/om_d_pen_lenses/m_zuiko/m_zuiko_digital_14_42mm_13556_ez/index.html),
 which is not too bad for on-the-bike use, but on a long multi-day trip I’d 
pack a proper lens as well.

To reduce bulk further, and to get to your question, I’ve been thinking of 
getting one of the less SLR-like bodies and the choice seems to me to between 
the rangefinder-like Olympus Pen-F and the Panasonic GX8 or GX9, which all have 
viewfinders rather just squint at the screen on the back. 

However, the Pen-F is discontinued and still rather pricey; the others are also 
quite pricey, even used, so I’m not sure I want to go there now that I’ve 
stopped working.

If I pursue this idea of bulking down I might look at something else 
altogether. I have used my Fuji X20 a lot, but the viewfinder is too small and 
picture quality could be better; it has also found its way apparently 
irretrievably into somebody’s handbag. 

But something small, robust with a decent VF, good picture quality, manual 
settings, RAW, and a zoom range of about 25-100mm 35mm-equivalent would be a 
winner.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to