I'll definitely agree with you about the build quality. Bob Rapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No! The difference is a rubber focusing ring and, perhaps, a loss of mechanical build quality. I have some of both and prefer the feel of the old S-M-C over the later SMC.
Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "smcforme" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:20 AM Subject: M42: SMC or Super-Multi-Coated? > I have heard that there are optical differences between some screw mount lenses marked SMC and those marked Super-Multi-Coated. Is this true? I have never actually seen a screw mount lens other than a 50mm or 55mm that was marked SMC, but I remember reading somewhere that there was a 200mm SMC that suposadly was better than the Super-Multi-Coated version. > Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
