The first time I ever placed a bid for anything on ebay it was for one of these. I won it and there were no other bidders! All of �30 ($44) it cost me inc p&p and it's been money well spent - my favourite lens, in fact the standard lens on my LX.
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Mishka wrote: > I am curious: is it that much better than other 35mm's (I mean, A 35/2 > and M 35/2.8)? I have the M 35/2.8 (bought it new) and the K is better. Hard to quantify, but on landscapes the pictures just 'feel' better - sharper and more saturated. I ought to do side-by-side pictures just to prove it to myself, but right now I'd part with the M 2.8 well before the K 3.5. (If anyone has a K 28mm or K 24mm they want to sell I'm over here guys!). Chris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
